FoodFen Logo

Report slams farmer-funded generic advertising

The statutory levy should be retained for the time being in each of the product areas to which it currently applies but some important changes are needed, according to Rosemary Radcliffe, who was asked by Ministers earlier in the year to conduct an independent review of the five agricultural and horticultural levy bodies.

Speaking on Radio 4’s Farming Today Programme prior to the release of  the report, Radcliffe described generic advertising campaigns, such as the MLC’s recent  ‘Beefy and Lamby’ ads, as “not really very successful…very unlikely to deliver value for money…and an inappropriate means of advertising”. 

The Review report (click here to download a copy), which is published today, examines the rationale for, and role, organisation, funding and functions of the five bodies and makes recommendations for the future.

A fundamental question examined in the report is whether there is still a case for having statutory levies at all. The Review says there is, for now, but the case is stronger in some product areas than in others and is likely to weaken over the next few years in some areas. So there is a need to keep matters under consideration and be prepared to wind up arrangements that outlive their usefulness, but in any case it is necessary to ensure that the levy delivers what the industries need in the most effective way, which means making some important changes.

On what is needed, the key conclusions were:

  • The industry sectors served by the levy bodies currently face a degree of challenge and change that is by any standards huge. Much good work is going on to support them but it is not always as effective as it might be.

  • The levy bodies are relatively small when seen in the wider context of the needs of the industries and their contribution is most effective when focused on activities that play to their strengths as independent, non-commercial but   industry-focused bodies, and/or where they work in partnership with others.

  • Arrangements for raising and spending levy money need to be, and to be seen to be, much more in the ‘ownership’ of the industries themselves, with greater transparency and more effective reporting to levy payers on what is being done with their money.

  • Detailed planning and delivery of services needs to be close to the individual groups of levy payers, but within a framework that encourages common working, where appropriate, to avoid duplication, and delivers improved performance monitoring.

  • Improved efficiency and lower costs can be achieved by making some changes to arrangements with regard to the levy and by moving to shared service arrangements in a number of areas.

  • On structural options, the Review rejects mergers between existing bodies but proposes instead a New Model that recognises the importance of all the key business drivers. The New Model retains a number of sector-specific bodies or ‘SectorCos’, that would be responsible for the efficient and effective delivery of services to the individual groups of levy payers. A new body, ‘NewCo’ would act as holding company for the SectorCos and be the ‘guardian’ of the common framework of activities and of performance monitoring. And another new body, ‘ServiceCo’ would be the shared service provider delivering enhanced efficiency and reduced costs. This New Model would result in significant on-going net savings for levy payers in return for a modest investment in the costs of change.

Radcliffe concluded “The health of the industry sectors covered by the levy bodies is of great importance to us all, not just in terms of their economic contribution but also in terms of their contribution to the wider sustainability agenda. I have been spending a lot of time listening to levy payers and others about the needs of these industries and I have been impressed by much of the work that is going on to support them in responding to the challenges they face. I believe the levy bodies have, potentially, an important role to play in this regard in the future. But I consider some important changes now need to be made, changes that are documented in detail in my report.”

 “These industries have been very hard-pressed and things are not getting any easier for them. We need to ensure that levy payers, the people who at the end of the day are paying the bill, get maximum value for money from the statutory levy. I believe my recommendations will help to achieve that.”

Sustainable Farming and Food Minister, Lord Bach, announced a full consultation on the report.

Lord Bach said: "I am conscious that Rosemary points to the need to improve accountability to levy payers in any new arrangements, and it must be right that they and other stakeholders are given the earliest opportunity to comment on the detailed programme of change that she recommends.  My fellow Ministers and I are therefore moving without delay to a full, formal consultation of stakeholder interests over the next 12 weeks. Subject to the views received, we will make further announcements on the way forward in the Spring."


FoodEast © 2004, All rights reserved.
This site is maintained by FoodEast Ltd
FoodEast and foodeast.com are the trading names of FoodEast Ltd
Registered Office: 11 Church Street, Northborough, Cambridgeshire, PE6 9BN, UK
Registered in England No. 4812836